Re: Log rotation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Log rotation
Date
Msg-id 200403251005.16485.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Log rotation  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Log rotation
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 12:31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > This thread seems to have died without a conclusion. AFAICS, we have 5
> > options:
> >
> > . the apache program - see below
> >   pro: robust, portable, extremely well tested, no effort to import
> >   con: possible license issues, limited features
> > . Peter Eisentraut's program
> >   pro: portable, better featured, no license issues
> >   con: code state uncertain, less well tested
> > . the Afilias script
> >   pro: well featured, no license issues
> >   con: not portable (relies on perl), testing status uncertain
> > . something new
> >   pro: no license issues, can make as featured as desired, portable
> >   con: lots of effort, untested
> > . nothing
> >   pro: no effort, no license issues :-)
> >   con: feature is desired
> >
> > The issues seem to have been thrashed out ad nauseam. Surely we can put
> > *something* in contrib for this? After all, nobody has to use it if they
> > don't want to.
>
> Shouldn't all of these just be on gborg?

Some could simply be an article/guide on techdocs and/or a chapter in the 
docs... "how to use postgresql with apache logrotate" for example

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: < operator for user-defined types
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Email addresses on developer bios site