Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.59"></HEAD
>
> > This qualifies as ancient. Newer versions are available from
> > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/projects/dsssl/index.html
>
> Okay. I see that both postgresql.org and Bruce are generating the docs
> with
> Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.7
> Shall we standardize on that and lynx 2.8.5 as the current "official"
> versions to use for building the docs?
2.8.5 is a development release of lynx, not a stable one:
Lynx Version 2.8.5dev.16 (01 Jun 2003)
Do we want to standardize on a development version of some tools? It is
only converting to text, so I guess it is OK.
I downloaded the version of lynx Tom has just so I can generate the
newer output. The only difference between my 2.8.3 lynx and 2.8.5 is
that 2.8.5 trips spaces on blank lines used between headings, which is
good.
I have also rebuilt the HISTORY file in CVS to match our official style
sheets.
> Also, I'm running openjade 1.3 on this machine, and as I recall it was
> a serious pain in the arse to build. Is it worth worrying about a newer
> version of that?
I can help you because I just installed new tools a few months ago. I
will phone you.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
