Re: psql variables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: psql variables
Date
Msg-id 200402091745.31365.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql variables  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: psql variables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> Perhaps you're suggesting shell variables were used as the design
> model for psql's variables (although I can't be sure, you didn't
> elaborate). If so, what I'm saying is that this model is not very
> friendly for setting psql-internal options, and we'd be better
> changing it as I've elaborated on elsewhere. Do you agree?

Shell variables did serve as a design model, mostly because I found it 
better to use *some* model rather than inventing behavior out of thin 
air.  Consequently, I am sort of biased on this.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: markw@osdl.org
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint