Re: Compile Vs RPMs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Paul Thomas
Subject Re: Compile Vs RPMs
Date
Msg-id 20040203230147.A23912@bacon
Whole thread Raw
In response to Compile Vs RPMs  ("Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 03/02/2004 20:58 Anjan Dave wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know whether there are any significant performance
> advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and
> 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm)
> from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel XEON (various speeds, upto
> 2.8GHz, single/dual/quad configuration).

Very unlikely I would have thought. Databases tend to speed-limited by I-O
performance and the amount of RAM available for caching etc. Having said
that, I've only got one machine (the laptop on which I'm writing this
email) which has still got its rpm binaries. My other machines have all
been upgraded from source.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller
Business |
| Computer Consultants         |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk   |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: Compile Vs RPMs
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Database conversion woes...