On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:04:49PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> El Lun 02 Feb 2004 11:59, Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> > But Fedora is very much a desktop linux distribution -- I wouldn't bet a
> > server on it.
>
> Why not? I don' t see much difference from other distributions, and at the
> end, if you want a real server you have to go through all the configuration
> to make sure it's going to have good performaces.
Fedora Core releases have too short a lifetime, by definition. You
don't want to be upgrading your servers every 6 months, do you? I'd
prefer something that gives me some more time before I have to consider
it obsolete. RHEL is a good example; I think they give you 3 years, 5
for RHAS (is this right?). Debian, Mandrake, FreeBSD o OpenBSD give me
a lot more confidence than FC because of this.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Si no sabes adonde vas, es muy probable que acabes en otra parte.
