Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> > Claudio, where are we on this patch? I see an even newer version in the
> archives:
> >
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-12/msg00361.php
>
> [Weird you and Google groups "missed" it!]
No, seems only _I_ missed it. The google display for groups:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.databases.postgresql.patches
Doesn't show individual messages but lists threads, _and_ it shows the
date of the last message in the thread, rather than the first. That's
how I missed it. How I missed it my mailbox, I have no idea. Sorry.
> > Anyway, Tom has looked at your newest patch and it looks good to him.
>
> I'm happy with the patch from the link above being committed if Tom has no
> more comments. Was only waiting for a final nod from him.
Thanks. Applied.
> Once it is in the source tree, give me a couple days and I'll fire off a
> patch with the actual CreateProcess calls... and then we are off into Win32
> signal land [shudder].
Great.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
