Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend
Date
Msg-id 200401061834.i06IYT719027@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > The procedure I'm following is:
>
> > - for trivial / obviously correct patches, just apply them immediately
>
> Check.
>
> > - for fairly simple patches, submit them to the list and apply them
> >   fairly soon afterward (say, within 24 hours or 48 hours). When I
> >   apply the patch, send another mail to wrap up the issue.
>
> I think the pgsql-committers log message is sufficient indication that
> you did it, and the followup message on -patches is unnecessary.
> We usually acknowledge applying patches from non-committers, on the
> theory that they might not be subscribed to pgsql-committers.  But
> for your situation I don't see the value in the extra message.

Agreed.  I just emailed Neil privately to say I think he is using good
judgement on when to apply and when to wait 24 hours.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: move 'Value' node into separate file