Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have
> > an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release.
> > Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball
> > packaging, and INSTALL too.
>
> Confused here, but how "up to date" is HISTORY in CVS to start with? I
> don't go out of my way to watch for them, but commits to HISTORY don't
> seem to be all that often to start with ... and how many ppl actually look
> at the HISTORY file *except* at release time?
Usually I modify HISTORY during beta, then move it to release.sgml, but
I could reverse that and do edits in release.sgml then regenerate and
copy HISTORY. It is mostly during beta. We could throw a URL into the
HISTORY file telling people where to look for the generated release
notes.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
