Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE
Date
Msg-id 20031222135229.H916@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE r ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have
> an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release.
> Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball
> packaging, and INSTALL too.

Confused here, but how "up to date" is HISTORY in CVS to start with?  I
don't go out of my way to watch for them, but commits to HISTORY don't
seem to be all that often to start with ... and how many ppl actually look
at the HISTORY file *except* at release time?


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE