Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date
Msg-id 200312170105.hBH15m424434@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)  ("Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
> > parts, but it looked OK to me.  Peter?
>
> That's what I said, that's what I meant.

Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not telling
me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find out where the
SGML build fails.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch
Next
From: Claudio Natoli
Date:
Subject: Re: fork/exec patch