Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > libpq++ got heaved overboard largely
> > because the autoconf burden for it was too high,
>
> That's news to me. Certainly the overhead doesn't grow smaller by
> splitting stuff up in smaller pieces.
Yea, now there is no configure for libpq++ at all, so you have to muck
around with it to get it to compile.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
