Re: 7.4 logging bug. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kurt Roeckx
Subject Re: 7.4 logging bug.
Date
Msg-id 20031121172551.GA30971@ping.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.4 logging bug.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:49:28AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> writes:
> > It's still logging the "recycled transation log file".  Is that
> > send to stdout instead of stderr maybe?
> 
> No, it all goes to stderr.  But that output comes from a different
> subprocess.  Not sure why that subprocess would still have working
> stderr if others don't ... any ideas anyone?

It seems quiting and starting psql "fixed" it.  So I guess it's
the backend that had the problem.  So it was a different
subprocess.

> Does cygwin have any equivalent of strace/ktrace?  It'd be useful
> to see whether the write() calls are still being issued or not.

It has a strace, but when I use it I get a nice exception.  I
never really got either strace or gdb to work properly under
cygwin when attachting to an existing process.


Kurt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] More detail on settings for pgavd?
Next
From: James Rogers
Date:
Subject: Re: Sponsoring enterprise features