Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts? - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
Date
Msg-id 200311200037.45322.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-www
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 18:29, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Forwarding to the correct list:  Hey guys!
>
> ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
> Subject: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:12:59 +0100 (CET)
> From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
> To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
> Cc: elein <elein@varlena.com>, <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
>
> Josh Berkus writes:
> > Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause
> > issues with readability.    See, for example,
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
> >
> > Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one
> > that's
>
> a
>
> > little easier on the eyes?   What I find particularly difficult are the
> > function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold"
> > italics.
>
> Compare with the "original" version:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-string.html
>
> That looks fairly reasonable to me.  So the problem appears to be in the
> CSS stylesheets.
>

not saying if its css one way or t'other, but it looks fine on the 7.3 doc
page...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: www@www.postgresql.com (World Wide Web Owner)
Date:
Subject: New Event
Next
From: Devrim GUNDUZ
Date:
Subject: Re: New Event