Re: Commercial binary support? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Commercial binary support?
Date
Msg-id 200311191856.hAJIu8S09977@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commercial binary support?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Commercial binary support?  ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is
> > > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own
> > > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here?
> >
> > Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several
> > companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL
> > and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not.
> 
> We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ...

And I know CommandPrompt doesn't care either.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Austin Gonyou
Date:
Subject: Re: Commercial binary support?
Next
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: Commercial binary support?