Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Archeron
Subject Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror
Date
Msg-id 200311191314.53697.archeron@archeron.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-www
On November 19, 2003 12:59, Robert Treat wrote:
> Well, I'm guilty of having made changes on the live server in the past,
> though I think I have always sent a note immediately afterword to you
> informing you of the change.  One potential issue we have all had though
> is that when developing the site you need a copy of the database on hand
> in order to get things working. I've manually pulled these down for
> myself in the past, but would you see an issue with checking in a
> pg_dump of the www server to cvs, so others could recreate a copy of the
> site?
>
> Robert Treat
  I was thinking the same thing myself after having to haywire php files
together just to get a (broken) page to display.  A pg_dump does not even
have to be in cvs really, just copied to a location on the web, say when the
backup pg_dump happens on the server. (Which I assume happens?)
 -Wade Klaver
--
Life is a tragedy for those who feel and a comedy for those who think.

/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: [Fwd: [pgsql-advocacy] Keeping 7.4 the top news item of the week]
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror