On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 07:27:01PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Is that really necessary?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Unfortunately, yes. libpq can't change the global setting of SIGPIPE
> >without breaking the surrounding application, but we don't want to crash
> >the app if the server connection has disappeared, either. So we have to
> >set the SIGPIPE handler and then restore it around every send().
> >
> >
> Ok. Ahm. No, wait. libpq is multi-threaded, right?
>
> signal handlers are a process property, not a thread property - that
> code is broken for multi-threaded apps.
> At least that's how I understand the opengroup man page, and a quick
> google confirmed that:
> http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=353662BF.9D70F63A%40brighttiger.com
>
> I haven't found a reliable thread-safe approach yet:
> My first idea was block with pthread_sigmask, after send check if
> pending with sigpending, and then delete with sigwait, and restore
> blocked state. But that breaks if SIGPIPE is blocked and a signal is
> already pending: there is no way to remove our additional SIGPIPE. I
> don't see how we can avoid destroying the realtime signal info.
>
> Mark: Is your dbt2 testapp multithreaded? I don't see the signal
> functions near the top in the profiles on the osdl website.
Yeah, my dbt2 applications are multithreaded.
Mark
