Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > We can also try to come up with a better scheme for verifying that
> > > we have started properly - I will think about that.
> >
> > There have been previous suggestions for a "pg_ping" functionality,
> > in which you could simply send a packet to the postmaster and it
> > would answer back if it's open for business. You can approximate
> > this by sending a deliberately invalid login packet, but it's not
> > quite the same thing. I think there were some concerns about
> > security though; check the archives.
>
> Um, I wrote pg_ping and sent it to -patches but got no comments.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-07/msg00053.php
>
> pg_ping is actually the basis for the threaded benchmark program I've
> got sitting in my tree, but I don't think folks here would look kindly
> on a -lpthread dependency given how up in the air pg's thread
> support/testing is at the moment. -sc
As far as I know, thread support is on the ground for platforms that
have tested it.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
