On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:34, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a
> > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
> >
> > Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
>
> Me, hardly ever use them :-) So I can assume that removing the implicit
> pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."
From the search_path certainly -- but we can we teach the difference
between implicit and explicit to the *is_visible functions?
