Re: Recomended FS - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Crawford
Subject Re: Recomended FS
Date
Msg-id 200310201610.35531.scrawford@pinpointresearch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recomended FS  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: Recomended FS  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
List pgsql-general
On Monday 20 October 2003 10:28 am, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Peter Childs wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > > A fast HD with a good RAID controller. Subject to budget, SCSI
> > > are beter buy than IDE. So does hardware SCSI RAID.
> >
> >     I hate asking this again. But WHY?
> >
> >     What SCSI gain in spinning at 15000RPM and larger buffers. They
> > lose in Space, and a slower bus. I would like to see some profe.
> > Sorry.
>
> SCSI beats IDE hands down for databases, and for one reason above
> all the rest.  They don't generally lie about fsync.
>....

Talk about timing...this article posted today seems quite apropos
(spoiler: SCSI beats IDE):

http://hardware.devchannel.org/hardwarechannel/03/10/20/1953249.shtml?tid=20&tid=38&tid=49

Cheers,
Steve


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mike Benoit
Date:
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Next
From: "Matthew D. Fuller"
Date:
Subject: Re: Recomended FS