Re: Buglist - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Buglist
Date
Msg-id 20030821202003.GD10003@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buglist  (Edmund Dengler <edmundd@eSentire.com>)
Responses Re: Buglist
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:05:28PM -0400, Edmund Dengler wrote:
> Well, if they are locked waiting on vacuum, then vacuum should upgrade
> it's priority to the highest waiting process (priority inheritance).
> This way, vacuum will be running at a priority level equivalent to who is
> waiting on it.

Right, but all that intelligence is something that isn't in there
now.  And anyway, the real issue is I/O, not processor.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Stored procedure advice needed
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list