Re: perfromance impact of vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jay O'Connor
Subject Re: perfromance impact of vacuum
Date
Msg-id 20030715110453.Q28847@altaica
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: perfromance impact of vacuum  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Responses Re: perfromance impact of vacuum  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
List pgsql-general
On 2003.07.15 09:53 Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:37:28 -0700,
>   Jay O'Connor <joconnor@cybermesa.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just curious but is the length of time to vacuum influenced more by the
> > size of the table or the number of dead tuples?
>
> I think the fraction of the table that is dead tuples is probably the
> best
> thing to look at for deciding when to vacuum (unless the tables are very
> small in which case checking for the number of blocks used may be
> better).
>

Actually what I meant is how long the vacuum runs.  We're going to have a
big database (few TB projected, but I don't know where those numbers come
from) and I'm trying to ausage concerns that vacuuming will impact
performance significantly.

Thanks
Jay

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Tkach
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] INSTEAD rule bug?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] INSTEAD rule bug?