Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Date
Msg-id 20030704203135.GB21568@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection  (Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:29:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. If so, can I get away with applying this post-feature-freeze?  I can
> argue that it's a bug fix, but perhaps some will disagree.

I'd say it is a bug fix.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Next
From: David Blasby
Date:
Subject: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3