Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Darcy Buskermolen
Subject Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Date
Msg-id 200307041420.34726.darcy@wavefire.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday 04 July 2003 13:31, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:29:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 2. If so, can I get away with applying this post-feature-freeze?  I can
> > argue that it's a bug fix, but perhaps some will disagree.
>
> I'd say it is a bug fix.
>
> Michael

I'm with you Michael/Tom on this one as well, Lets at least get this framework
inplace, we can always experment with what values we settle on.


--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx:  250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3
Next
From: David Blasby
Date:
Subject: Re: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3