Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Other than me, I think you mean. dd/mm/yyyy and mm/dd/yyyy are
> > inherently ambiguous in the real world, and when you can clearly
> > determine what the intended meaning is, I think it's more reasonable
> > to assume the datestyle isn't set correctly than to reject the data.
>
> That might even make the slightest sense if the supposedly wrong datestyle
> would then stay switched. But the automatic switching only happens for a
> certain subsets of inputs and only in that instance. So if a user did
> really mean the opposite setting he will not be happy, and if the user did
> not mean the opposite setting he will not be happy either. So no one is
> happy.
I think we have had enough discussion to remove the question mark from
this TODO item:
* Allow current datestyle to restrict dates; prevent month/day swapping
from making invalid dates valid
Of course, if later discussion changes, I will re-add it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
