Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date
Msg-id 200306101427.30123.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> Yes.  It's toast ... didn't you see that flamewar a couple months ago?

Nope, missed it.  There's enough traffic on this list that I ignore anything
that I'm not working on.

So are we eliminating the autocommit GUC entirely, or just from
postgresql.conf?

(I never used the setting, myself ...)

--
-Josh BerkusAglio Database SolutionsSan Francisco



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64