Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Creager
Subject Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan
Date
Msg-id 20030530212846.26a82109.Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 30 May 2003 14:46:12 -0600 (MDT)
"scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> said something like:

>
> level cache is.  On my machine it's about 800 meg. It's measured in 8k > blocks, so 100,000 * 8k ~ 800 meg.  The
smallerthis is, the more  

Any thoughts on how to figure this out (disk buffer size)?  For some reason, my system (2xAMD 2800+, 2Gb RAM 2.4.21 -
/proc/meminfo)only shows a usage of  88kb of 'Buffers' usage, and that never changes.  My 'Cached' usage is 1.7Gb.
I'vehit the kernel mailing list, and the one response I got said don't worry about it :-( 

Cheers,
Rob

--
O_

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used
Next
From: "Nikolaus Dilger"
Date:
Subject: Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan