Re: GUC patch for Win32 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: GUC patch for Win32
Date
Msg-id 200305031926.h43JQwT07103@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC patch for Win32  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: GUC patch for Win32  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> What about all the other global variables?  Will there be a separate
> mechanism for each kind?

Good question.  I am not sure yet.  I figured I would hit the GUC ones
first because they are easy and all in one place, then see what others
exist in the Peer Direct patch.

Did I hit all the GUC structure members that need to be dumped --- name,
value, source?

>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Here is a patch that saves the postmaster GUC state into a file to be
> > read in by exec'ed backends.  This is a start toward a fork/exec option
> > for Unix (for testing) and a CreateProcess option for Win32.
> >
> > The patch basically writes all modified GUC variables to a binary file
> > that can be read in by newly created exec'ed backends.


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC patch for Win32
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] refcursor result set patch