Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Subject Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Date
Msg-id 200305030357.54875.darcy@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
List pgsql-performance
On Friday 02 May 2003 16:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> More disks is almost always better.  Putting WAL on a seperate (non-RAID)
> disk is usually a very good idea.

From a performance POV perhaps.  The subject came up on hackers recently and
it was pointed out that if you use RAID for reliability and redundancy rather
than for performance, you need to keep the WAL files on the RAID too.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Becky Neville
Date:
Subject: NOT IN doesn't use index?
Next
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)