> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 10:31, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> > At 08:13 AM 4/22/2003 -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> > >That's the question...That 2 TB of data is nothing but documents and
> > >images. I'm under the perception that if that gets parked on a fibre
> > >channel disk array/ SAN the data will be pretty safe, and the server
> > >mostly replaceable at that time. Storage is my worry more than
> > >processing power. I don't think I'm on crack here...?
> >
> > How about backups? Backing up 2-16TB needs a bit more planning and design.
> The proposed solution here is to have the raid controller mirror accross
> the street to a similar system. At what point do off line backups become
> pointless?
I've always been told to ask the question -- what's your data worth to
you or how much $ will you lose if you lose your data? That should answer
the question on offline backups.
-philip
