Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ed L.
Subject Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit
Date
Msg-id 200304141346.24652.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Monday April 14 2003 1:16, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> I saw somewhere on this thread that there is no way to tell when
> something is committed. that really doesn't make sense, since postgres
> is a MVCC system. Doesn't the versioning automatically supply commit
> times?

I believe the context of those comments was regarding what information was
(not) available from within a transaction.  Of course, commit ordering is
available in the WAL logs.

Ed


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Inserting a needed record before a select
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange query optimization in 7.3.2