On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:34:26AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is anybody interested in the idea of a GUC parameter to choose whether
> "timestamp" means "timestamp with time zone" (useful) or "timestamp
> without time zone" (anally spec-compliant)? Or would that just muddy
> the waters even more than they are already? We already changed the
> meaning once...
Well, if you added the GUC and made the default the (silly, I agree)
SQL-spec behaviour, then those who care about this sort of thing will
be able to put it back the way they want.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110