Re: location of the configuration files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: location of the configuration files
Date
Msg-id 200302131830.45143.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: location of the configuration files  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Responses Re: location of the configuration files
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 13 February 2003 18:07, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> Actually FHS says the opposite.  If the distribution installs PostgreSQL
> then the config files belong in /etc/postgresql.  If the admin does then
> they belong in /usr/local/etc/postgresql.  FHS is out of their tree.  If
> PostgreSQL or any other package is not critical to the basic operation of
> the operating system, it's config files shouldn't be polluting /etc.

PostgreSQL is as critical as PHP, Apache, or whatever other package is being
backended by PostgreSQL.  If the package is provided by the distributor,
consider it part of the OS.  If it isn't, well, it isn't.

This is so that local admin installed (from source -- not from binary package)
files don't get clobbered by the next operating system binary upgrade.  In
that context the FHS (LSB) mandate makes lots of sense.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files