Re: UPDATE slow [Viruschecked] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Patric Bechtel
Subject Re: UPDATE slow [Viruschecked]
Date
Msg-id 20030204225253.9812A474E42@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UPDATE slow  (John Smith <john_smith_45678@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:37:48 -0800 (PST), John Smith wrote:

Hello John

try:

update stats set clicks=3344 where link_id=1::int8;

I suppose that link_id is an int8 datatype? This bug is already known and will hopefully be fixed in 7.4.

Patric


>If this helps :)

>db=# explain analyze update stats set clicks = 3344 where link_id=1;
>QUERY PLAN
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Index Scan using idx_link_id on stats
>(cost=0.00..149.42 rows=50 width=30) (actual time=0.58..727.45 rows=9994 loops=1)
>  Index Cond: (link_id = 1)
>Total runtime: 8361.93 msec
>(3 rows)

>Just tried it on Linux - still takes 5-10 seconds. Any speed-up tips? Also tried it on MySQL and the update is nearly
instantaneous:(.  
>John
>I have about 11000 rows and this query is much slower than I expected:

>update stats set clicks = 123;

>stats is basically just: id, clicks; with indexes on each. Right now, the query takes about 10 seconds to execute.
It'salso on windows 2000/cygwin (if that  
contributes to slowness). Is it normal for updates like this on that many rows to take a while?



>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 2636 F26E F523 7D62  4377 D206 7C68 06BB

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies.

iQA+AwUBPkA2DXxoBrvMu8qQEQKJcwCY7c1OjuvS/RIQeN+q0Z4dWIHp/gCdFEAR
VRTPdgIp8C0PM6Tv3a2NqgA=
=4QYn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE slow
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE slow