Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kurt Roeckx
Subject Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Date
Msg-id 20030202191340.GA10137@ping.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:49:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Gavin Sherry wrote:
> >> I don't think we should listen on IPv6 just because it is supported. It
> >> should be a configuration variable:
> >> 
> >> tcpip_socket = true
> >> ipv6 = true
> 
> > We had a huge discussion on this.  I think you were away for it.  You
> > can control what you listen on by modifying pg_hba.conf.
> 
> Can you actually control whether the postmaster is listening by
> modifying pg_hba.conf?  I don't think so.

Why isn't virtual_host used for deciding to what addresses it
should listen?

It currently only seems to support 1 address, and I don't really
know why.  Is there a reason you can't make this a list of
hostnames/ip addresses?  It really is where it belongs.


Kurt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Next
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS