Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
Date
Msg-id 200301040133.h041XlP05033@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > But it is a "sect1" in libpq.  It should be a "sect1" somewhere that
> > makes more sense.
> > ...
> > It doesn't belong in libpq, and it doesn't belong in the Programmer's
> > Guide.
> 
> How could it not belong in libpq?  But you are right that the
> Programmer's Guide seems the wrong place for information that
> is important to end-users.

Some people don't even know libpq exists.  If someone uses only
psql, how would they know?

> Perhaps libpq needs to have a chapter in the User's Guide as
> well as a chapter in the Programmer's Guide?

> Or maybe we could put the relevant information into a reference
> page under PostgreSQL Client Applications (titled something
> along the line of "common behavior of all libpq-based client
> applications").

Yep, that's what I would do.

-- Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Threads