On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> <snip>
> > Strangely I was just thinking the same thing. If all the info is on
> > advocacy, then what exactly will be left on the main site? Idocs?
>
> Good point, and worth thinking about then.
I think we're all in pseudo-agreement here ... we need clearer lines drawn
... IMHO, the *main* thing that is on www.postgresql.org is the docs ...
all the docs, not just idocs ... IMHO, techdocs is the tutorials and
guides that are developed/provided independantly of the core documentation
...
www.postgresql.org, once its ready, is going to point to the new portal,
after which what is now www.postgresql.org is going to need to tighten
itself up to reduce redundancy ... I'd personally like to see the iDocs
stuff somehow used more heavily then I think it is now ... one of the neat
things about it is the ability, like with the PHP site, to add
comments/examples.
I think the only limitation that I've heard of anyone talking about as
concerns idocs is the search facility is a bit weak, which is actually one
of the reasons that I don't use it as often as I could ...
xfunc-c.html
release-6-1.html
release-6-2.html
tutorial-table.html
datatype.html
release-6-3.html
release-6-1-1.html
plpgsql-trigger.html
setindex.html
release-6-5-2.html
regress-evaluation.html
plpgsql-declarations.html
plpgsql-expressions.html
release-0-03.html
release-6-5.html
release-7-0-1.html
release-7-0.html
release-7-1.html
release-7-2.html
routine-vacuuming.html
rules-insert.html
runtime-config.html
sql-comment.html
functions-datetime.html
functions-formatting.html
datatype-datetime.html
sql-createtable.html
sql-expressions.html
sql-keywords-appendix.html
sql-set.html
triggers.html
would it be possible to replace the .html file with the page Title? That
way, for instance, I can choose to go to 'Date/Time Types' instead of
going datatype-datetimes.html?
