Re: Postgresql and multithreading - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Date
Msg-id 200210181539.g9IFdIO09483@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql and multithreading  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes:
> > On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we
> >> should use it".  The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong
> >> end in these discussions.
> 
> > ... Now, it seems, that
> > people don't want to answer questions at all as it's bothering the
> > developers.
> 
> Not at all.  But rehashing issues that have been talked out repeatedly
> is starting to bug some of us ;-).  Perhaps the correct "standard
> answer" is more like "this has been discussed before, please read the
> list archives".

I need to add something to the developers FAQ on this.  I will do it
soon.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: ECPG and bison