Re: Postgresql and multithreading - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Date
Msg-id 17578.1034951318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql and multithreading  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Responses Re: Postgresql and multithreading  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Postgresql and multithreading  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Re: Postgresql and multithreading  (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we
>> should use it".  The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong
>> end in these discussions.

> ... Now, it seems, that
> people don't want to answer questions at all as it's bothering the
> developers.

Not at all.  But rehashing issues that have been talked out repeatedly
is starting to bug some of us ;-).  Perhaps the correct "standard
answer" is more like "this has been discussed before, please read the
list archives".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading