On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was wondering whether an ALTER TABLE command is really the right way
> to approach this. If we had an ALTER-type command, presumably the
> implication is that its effects would be global to all backends. But
> the uses that I've seen for suspending trigger invocations would be
> happier with a local, temporary setting that only affects the current
> backend. Any thoughts about that?
I may be missing something here, but the only circumstance where i could
see such being useful would be a load of a database ... other then that,
how would overriding triggers be considered a good thing?
