Greg Copeland wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> I see. I just always assumed that it would be done as part of table
> space effort as it's such a defacto feature.
>
> I am curious as to why no one has commented on the other rather obvious
> performance enhancement which was brought up in this thread. Allowing
> for parallel sorting seems rather obvious and is a common enhancement
> yet seems to of been completely dismissed as people seem to be fixated
> on I/O. Go figure.
We think we are fixated on I/O because we think that is where the delay
is. Is there a reason we shouldn't think that?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
