Re: "lo" large object - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Patrick Welche
Subject Re: "lo" large object
Date
Msg-id 20020925212610.C9603@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "lo" large object  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: "lo" large object  (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:11:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes:
> > lo being the type to keep psqlodbc happy when importing M$ access files. The
> > old definition was:
>
> > CREATE TYPE lo (
> >     INTERNALLENGTH = 4,
> >     INPUT = int4in,
> >     OUTPUT = int4out,
>
> Hm.  The system doesn't tolerate type cheats like that anymore
> (and the code was wrong anyway, since it should've been using
> oidin/oidout).
>
> I guess we'll have to fix the contrib/lo module.  Thanks for the
> report...

I didn't know about contrib/lo - the above was in a FAQ - I think where
you get the psqlodbc driver from..

Cheers,

Patrick

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "lo" large object
Next
From: Patrick Welche
Date:
Subject: Relation 0 does not exist