On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:18:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I had a thought about what to do with the ECPG grammar-too-big problem:
> rather than depending on a beta release of bison, we could attack the
> problem directly by omitting some of the backend grammar from what ECPG
> supports. Surely there are not many people using ECPG to issue obscure
> utility commands like, for example, DROP OPERATOR CLASS.
But then there may be one. And I'd prefer to not remove features that
used to exist.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
