Robert Treat wrote:
> It seems all of this discussion misses the point. Either it has a large
> amount of impact and the idea gets rejected because of implementation
> issues, or it has little impact but it's nothing the core group wants to
> implement. If the problem is finding someone to implement it, it sounds
> like Justin has found such a person, so are we going to stand in his way
> while we wax poetic about OS religion and corporate philosophies or can
> he start submitting patches?
Well, I have Win32 patches here I am reviewing. I think I can say that
the changes are minimal and probably will be accepted for addition into
7.4. I am actually surprised at how little is required.
Right now, 7.4 is targeted with point-in-time recovery and Win32. And,
in fact, both patches are almost ready for inclusion into CVS, so we
may find that 7.4 has a very short release cycle.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073