On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 22:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I don't see the logic here. Using postgresql.conf, you set it
> > once and it remains set until you change it again. With -X, you have to
> > use it every time. I think that's where the votes came from.
>
> Ah, so you are saying that you type out your full command line each and
> every time you start up the server? I know, in my case, I have a shell
> script setup that I edit my changes in so that I don't have to remember
> ...
the effort/danger of editing a shell script can't be less than editing
postgresql.conf
>
> > You argued that -X and GUC make sense, but why add -X when can get it
> > done at once in postgresql.conf. Also, consider changing the location
> > does require moving the WAL files, so you already have this extra step.
> > Adding to postgresql.conf is easy. I don't think you can just point it
> > at a random empty directory on startup. Our goal was to reduce params
> > to postmaster/postgres in favor of GUC, not add to them.
>
> I don't disagree that editing postgresql.conf is easy, but its not
> something that ppl would naturally thing of ... if I want to move a
> directory with most servers I run, I will generally do a man to find out
> what command options are required to do this change, and, if none are
> provided, just create a god-forsaken symlink ...
I don't know if I agree with that. Most servers (apache for instance) have
configuration variables on where files are going to live, not command line
options.
>
> The man page for postmaster should have something in it like:
>
> -X <directory> Specifies an alternate location for WAL files. Superseded
> by setting xlog_path in postmaster.conf
>
Well, as with most (all?) GUC variables, wouldn't you have the option of doing
postmaster -o "pgxlog=/dev/null" and have the same functionality as -X ?
> Hell, if you are going to remove -X because its 'easier to do it in
> postmaster.conf', you should be looking at removing *all* command line
> args that are better represented in the postmaster.conf file ...
>
Generally speaking people should be looking to avoid useing command line flags
and useing whats in the postgresql.conf, IMHO.
<snip>
>
> the GUC value should override the command line option, agreed ... but the
> ability to use the command line should not be removed just because some
> ppl aren't competent enough to adjust their startup scripts if they change
> their system ...
>
Shouldn't this work the other way around? Use what's in the conf file unless I
explicitly state otherwise? IIRC that's how it works with -i
Robert Treat
--
LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
