Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id 200209121604.g8CG43J02210@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
scott.marlowe wrote:
> > Seems like the NT4 users are left out in the cold though until we add
> > some kind of ability for PostgreSQL to not look at the filesystem for
> > info about where to put the xlog files.
> 
> This isn't true.  With the resource kit, you get the gnu utils, and ln 
> works a charm under NT4 with ntfs.  And not just for directories, but 
> files as well.  Unless Microsoft somehow removed that functionality in the 
> intervening years since I've used NT.  (wouldn't put it past them, but I 
> doubt they have.)

Yes, this is what I remember, that Cygwin had symlinks, and at that time
that was the only Win32 OS we supported.  Now, with native Win32 port
coming, we have to figure out what is available.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?