Re: SET SCHEMA? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: SET SCHEMA?
Date
Msg-id 200208271925.g7RJPNk00808@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET SCHEMA?  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: SET SCHEMA?  (Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Can someone explain where we are on this?  Is it a TODO item?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Would it be useful to implement the SET SCHEMA command from SQL92? (I
> > assume it's also in 99.)
> >
> > I guess that SET SCHEMA should change the front of the search path, so
> > that it would change the schema reported by current_schema().  It would
> > be a simplified form of SET SEARCH_PATH.
> 
> Hrm - it would be sort of silly to launch an all-new standards-compliant
> schema support without it?
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items