Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql
Date
Msg-id 200208161950.g7GJoLn05309@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql  (Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>)
List pgsql-patches
[  Tom will review.]

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> >
> > >> A couple of bits of the depend/constraint patch that were not applied.
> >
> > Again, this is code I still gotta review...
>
> The attached better handles constraint triggers which are not foreign
> keys.   It helps 7.2.
>
> Is there any reason to create new constraint triggers?  Could the
> CONSTRAINT clause be removed after a couple of releases?
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE()