Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > Some mentioned using user@dbname, though the idea of sorting made
> > several recant their votes.
> >
> > So, based on the voting, I think dbname.username is an agreed-upon
> > feature addition for 7.3. I will work on a final patch with
> > documentation and post it to the patches list for more comment.
>
> The nice thing about using an @ sign, amongst being more consistent
> with kerberos and email, is that it doesn't preclude the use of .'s in
> a database name. For simplicity's sake, I'd really like to be able to
> continue issuing database names that are identical to the domain that
> they serve and worry that relying on a "." will either make the use of
> a dot in the username or database impossible. An @ sign, on the other
> hand, is the ubiquitously agreed upon username/host separator and
> makes it all that much more consistent for users and administrators.
>
> Username: john.doe
> Database: foo.com
> possible pg_shadow entry #1: john.doe.foo.com
> possible pg_shadow entry #2: john.doe@foo.com
>
> If people are worried about the sorting, ORDER BY domain, username.
> My $0.02. -sc
Well, they aren't separate fields so you can't ORDER BY domain. The dot
was used so it looks like a schema based on dbname.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
