Re: libpqxx - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: libpqxx
Date
Msg-id 20020812164236.C24309-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpqxx  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: libpqxx  ("Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>)
Re: libpqxx  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > The problem I see now is that libpqxx has a completely different build
> > system and documentation system.
>
> Unless someone's going to do the work to integrate libpqxx into our
> build/documentation system, I have to agree with Peter: it should not
> be part of our core distribution.

For this, all I've been waiting for is for J to get the standalone to
build and then going to dive into that ...

> Since Marc's been moaning about bloat, I'm sure he'll vote for pulling
> both libpq++ and libpqxx from the core distro and making them separate
> packages.  This would be okay with me.

Okay, but if we are going to pull libpqxx, what about the other lib's too?

> However: making libpq++ buildable standalone would take some work too.
> Any way you slice it, we need some work here... any volunteers?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ngpg@grymmjack.com
Date:
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:
Next
From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen"
Date:
Subject: Re: libpqxx