Re: libpqxx - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpqxx
Date
Msg-id 19524.1029093664@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to libpqxx  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: libpqxx
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The problem I see now is that libpqxx has a completely different build
> system and documentation system.

Unless someone's going to do the work to integrate libpqxx into our
build/documentation system, I have to agree with Peter: it should not
be part of our core distribution.

Since Marc's been moaning about bloat, I'm sure he'll vote for pulling
both libpq++ and libpqxx from the core distro and making them separate
packages.  This would be okay with me.

However: making libpq++ buildable standalone would take some work too.
Any way you slice it, we need some work here... any volunteers?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible (was: Re:
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: python patch